Let's face it. America is pretty darn lousy when we play outside America, and even when we play other teams at home, we still manage to screw things up.
In 2007 and 2008 both D.C. and Houston advanced to the semi-finals of the CONCACAF Champions Cup, marking the last great accomplishments in CONCACAF tournaments, if you are to mention them as such. The last win in the tournament came in 2000 when Los Angeles squeaked by Olimpia to take the crown. Before then it was D.C. in 1998 that took the trophy home, but there has been no real threat made by an American club in almost a decade.
So what gives? Does America not care about the tournament? Is it a lack of funding that keeps teams from competing or is it the fact that our schedule prevents clubs in America from putting together sides that can stand up to their peers?
There are a lot of questions, and very few answers. The reality of the situation is that America is different from Central America and the way we play the game and the manner that tournaments are competed varies on a year-by-year basis. If we were to look at all the success this league has had in terms of growth, we would undoubtedly look at the trophies D.C. United has obtained and the fact that MLS championships have been won by seven different franchises.
Teams grow yearly in terms of talent and development but when the league was young and without much guidance we had the most success. Perhaps the reason American clubs have failed to consistently produce is because of the lack of heart rather than the MLS throwing them a bone and giving them better opportunities to succeed.
Back in the day, the MLS was new, exciting and searching for the next frontier. They found excitement in international tournaments and D.C. won the last installment of the Copa Interamericana in 1998 and even the Chicago Fire came in third in the CONCACAF Champions Cup after their first season. It was like the first weeks of falling in love and the MLS was quickly rising.
I guess this is also why it is not surprising that many clubs that start up have success like Houston when they moved from San Jose, when Chicago won the U.S. Open Cup and the MLS Cup in their inaugural season and now Seattle Sounders taking the U.S. Open Cup and fighting in their first playoffs. But as all good relationships go, some of the sparkle is lost, and while amicable relationships built on mediocrity can be developed, it's pretty difficult to keep what once was bright and shiny for long.
Today, clubs struggle financially and look for creative ways to bring back fans, but what clubs should be doing is looking at the way they play the game.
That type of heart that has long been missing from the MLS is what can create future successes and what will bring more fans to the league. The statistics don't lie, and when things are fresh and new, everything works out better. Recreating it through a recommitment to the club is the only way to get it back. Toronto fans in their first couple years tolerated a poorly run club because they wanted a team so badly. It has finally come to blows with management and the only answer is to get the passion back into a club that already has the players it needs to compete.
The same can go for most MLS franchises; bring in heart and good things will happen. After watching Seattle and their fans cheer their team to a 0-0 draw tonight, I think it's evident that this club will do good things in the future because of the amount of love of the game that they exude all over the pitch.
My only hope is that the heart that existed back in the 90's will come back to stay very soon and start filling the trophy cases across the nation.
Save to delicious Saved by
0 users



































